Excerpts

INTRODUCTION Kleptocrat Nation klep...to...crat na...tion (klep¥te krat na¥ shen), n. 1. a body of people ruled by thieves 2. a government characterized by the practice of transferring money and power from the many to the few 3. a ruling class of moneyed elites that usurps liberty, justice, sovereignty, and other democratic rights from the people 4. the USA in 2003 The Kleptocrats have taken over. Look at Americaís leadership todayónot just political, but corporate, too. Tell me you wouldnít trade the whole mess of them for one good kindergarten teacher. Forget George W for a moment (weíll get to him soon enough) and sneak a peek at practically any big-deal CEO, congressional heavy, media baron, talk-show yakker, pompadoured TV preacher, and the other pushers of Americaís new ethic of grab-it-and-go greed. Sheesh! In a crunch, would you want to be tied at the waist to any of these people? When I look at any one of them, I canít help mumbling to myself: 100,000 sperm and you were the fastest? Yet, theyíre in charge! Here we are, living in the wealthiest country in history, a country of boundless possibilities, a country made up of a people deeply committed to democratic ideals, a country with the potential for spectacular human achievementóbut we find ourselves ruled (politically, economically, culturally, and ethically) by a confederacy of Kleptocrats. When did you first realize or at least begin to suspect that America was lost? Not physically, of courseóweíre right here. Lost its way, is what I mean, having wandered from the brave and true path first pointed out by Tom Paine, T.J., Jimmy Madison, and several other good thinkers back around 1776óa path toward a society focused not on empire, but on enlightenment and egalitarianism. Weíve never reached that glorious place, of course, but the important thing is that in our two- century sojourn weíve been steadily striving to get there...and making progress. If any one thing really characterizes this big boiling pot of diversity dubbed ìAmericaî it is that weíre a nation of strivers. Unfortunately, the cultural elites want to minimalize this powerful virtue by reducing it to nothing more than individuals striving for material gainóWho Wants to Be a Millionaire, How to Get Rich in the Next Half Hour!, You Might Already Be a Winner. Then they wonder why thereís such a gaping hole in America, an emptiness that canít be filled by nonstop shopping, prepaid elections, more bunting, and reality TV. When the Powers That Be started defining a personís value by the value of his stock portfolio, they lost America, for thatís not who we are. These Powers are as clueless as the doomed husband in this divorce case: attorney: What was the first thing your husband said to you when you woke up that morning? witness: He said, ìWhere am I, Cathy?î attorney: And why did that upset you? witness: My name is Susan. Donít go calling us names like ìConsumerî or ìStakeholderî when who we are is full-fledged, dyed-in-the-wool, unbridled, rambunctious citizensóindeed, weíre the ultimate sovereigns of this great land. We donít strive merely for material gain, but also for the spiritual satisfaction of building community and reaping the deeper richness of the common good. The idea of belonging to something larger than our own egos and bank accounts, the idea of caring, sharing, and participating as a public, is the BIG IDEA of America itself. As a boy growing up in Denison, Texas, I was taught this unifying, moral concept by hardworking, Depression-era parents who ran a small business in our small town. They knew from experience and from their hearts what America is all about: ìEverybody does better when everybody does betterî is how my old Daddy used to put it. The unforgivable transgression of todayís leaders is that theyíve abandoned this common wisdom of the common good and quit striving for that world of enlightenment and egalitarianism that the founders envisioned and that so many throughout our history have struggled to build. Instead, whether from the top executive suites or from the White House, the people in charge today are aggressively pushing a soulless ethic that shouts: ìEveryone on your own, grab all you can, and if youíve got enough money, secure yourself in a gated compound.î Whoa there, greedbreath. Thatís not a society, itís a cockfight! And itís damned sure not the proud country that we thought we were living inóthe land of Liberty and Justice for All. Not only are the Kleptocrats stealing our country from us, theyíre stealing our democratic idealsóthe very idea of America. And itís time to take it back. SAPSUCKERS How far have the elites moved from us? So far that even the moderates have lost their way. Take Sherwood Boehlert. Heís a Republican congressman, but despite that, not a bad guy. Sherwood thinks of himself as ìpart of the enlightened middle.î From central New York, heís been in the House of Representatives for twenty-one years now. A long time. Maybe a tad too long. He says he loves the job, calling it the ìultimate aphrodisiac.î Hmmmm. OK, I understand that people who shovel muck for a living come to love the smell, so everyone to his own. But Sherwood said something not long ago that made me think that maybe heís been sniffing the perfumes of high office longer than is good for him: ìItís the peopleís house,î he gushed about his side of the Capitol, ìthe one institution in the whole wide world thatís the personification of this great democracy of ours.î Uh-oh. Quick, someone dial 9-1-1. We need to rush an EMS Reality Crew over to Congress, grab Sherwood, strap him down, and jolt his head with defibrillator pads to shock the poor delusional fellow back to earth. Think about it: Congress, democracy. Do these two words fit together in your mind? America is a nation of nurses, office workers, cabdrivers, schoolteachers, pharmacists, shopkeepers, middle managers, truck drivers, shift workers, librarians, cleaning people, electricians, fruit pickers, struggling artistsóhow many of our ilk are sitting next to Sherwood in ìthe peopleís houseî? The great majority of Americans make less than $50,000 a year; half make under $32,000. How many members of Congress come from such modest backgrounds? Todayís Congress is made up of business executives, lawyers, and former political operatives (which Boehlert was). The Public Interest Research Group reports that nearly half of the people newly elected to Congress last year are millionaires. This is the personification of democracy? Itís time to play ìWHO WANTS TO BE A CONGRESS CRITTER?î There are 280 million Americans. To win todayís top prize, tell me how many of us are millionaires? BLHAAAAT. Timeís up. The answer: 2.1 million. Weíll do the math for you. Thatís about 7/10 of 1 percent of the people. Not only do the members tend to descend into Congress from the economic heights, but they also spend practically all of their substantive and social time with others from the heights. Congressís real constituency is no longer you and me, but the people who ìmatter.î These are your top-floor corporate executives and the moneyed elites who have full-time lobbyists and who make the $1,000-and-higher campaign donations (only 0.12 percent of Americans are in this class) that grease the wheels of congressional incumbency. They are the privileged few who know members by their first names, who get every one of their phone calls returnedóand who get their agendas adopted. Perhaps this gaping economic chasm between those on the inside and all the rest of us on the outside explains why our strumpets of state never get around to dealing with little matters like assuring health care for all families, passing living-wage legislation, and making sure everyone gets a decent retirement. Members of the congressional club feel no urgency because, hey, itís not themóthey have no personal anxiety about such matters, because (one) theyíre well off and (two) theyíre covered on all this by us taxpayers. Yes, even the multimillionaires in Congress get: ï Full platinum-level health coverage for them and their families, including choosing their own docs, seeing the specialists they need, dental care, and cosmetic surgery for their pets. (Just kidding about that last oneóbut donít put it past them!) ï A rosy retirement, with pensions that can rise higher than the pay they got while in office. Just the starting pensions are sweet: Phil Gramm, who finally did something for the people of Texas by leaving the Senate last year, starts out drawing retirement pay of $78,534 a year. Heíll be paid more for doing nothing than 80-plus percent of us Americans are paid for working full-time. ï Regular cost-of-living pay raises. While Congress has not seen fit to increase the minimum wage (still $5.15 an hour) since 1996, the members did give themselves four $5,000 pay raises during the past five years. This $20,000 ìadjustmentî in each of their own annual pay packets is $8,000 more than the gross pay that a full-time minimum-wage worker would get if Congress ever gets around to the one-dollar wage hike theyíve been ìtalkingî about for years. ï Excellent job security. Did you know that a member of Congress is four times more likely to die in office than to lose an election? This is not only because of the special-interest money theyíre stuffed with, but also because the GOP and Democrats conspire to divide the turf in each state, gerrymandering districts to assure that 96 percent of them are ìsafeî for the incumbents. Thereís not much democracy in a rigged system that now allows only about 20 of the 435 House seats to be competitive in each election cycle. As a bunch (and, yes, there are important exceptions within the bunch), I think of todayís Congress as a colony of cicadas. These are interesting insects with powerful survivalist genes. After hatching from eggs laid in tree limbs, cicadas drop to the ground, immediately burrow deep, and attach themselves to tree roots, where they suck the sap for thirteen years. The major difference is that Congress Critters suck the sap much longer. ONWARD TO RECLAIM AMERICA! A couple of years ago, Japanese police discovered more than four hundred pieces of womenís underwear in the home of Sadao Ushimura, a fellow who was a prominent official in Japanís finance ministry at the time. Mr. Ushimura proclaimed total innocence of any possible scandal or perversion, explaining: ìI picked up all lingerie on the streets by pure chance.î We still have our underwear in America, but weíve been stripped of a garment far more delicate and precious: our democracy. On this sprawling continent with its cacophony of voices and unprecedented clash of cultures, weíve been able to hold it all together through the years because of our peopleís instinctive and tenacious belief in the sanctity of democratic principles. But something has gone terribly wrong in our country. The essence of democracyóour power to control decisions that affect usóhas steadily and quietly been pilfered by corporate Kleptocrats. They have collected up our democratic powers piece by piece, hoarding them in the privacy of their own fiefdoms. These elites (fully abetted by the governmental elites they have bought) now effectively control the decisions that affect We the Peopleóeverything from public- spending priorities to environmental degradation, from wages to war, from whatís on the ìnewsî to who gets elected. This has taken place not by ìpure chance,î but through deliberate filching, and the filching now has reached the level of wholesale looting. We can no longer avoid the reality in front of us: The elites have pulled off a slow-motion coup, radically wrenching Americaís power balance from a peopleís democracy to Kleptocrat Nation. This would be terribly depressing except for one thing, which is that one basic has definitely NOT changed in our land: The people (you rascals!) still have that instinctive and tenacious belief in our historic democratic principles. The antidote to kleptocracy is the age-old medicine of democratic struggle, agitation, and organizationóand all across our country, the rebellion is on! As happened in the rebellion of 1776, as happened in the populist revolt against the robber barons of the nineteenth century, and as is already happening in community after community today, Americaís historic democratic yearnings will not be long suppressed. Despite our present leadership (with their autocratic, plutocratic, and imperialistic ambitions), this is a nation of irrepressible democrats, and their spirit will out. I think of my country like a rosebush. Many people say roses are fundamentally flawed because they have thorns. But I see it differentlyóI think itís wonderful that thorns have roses. America is a thorny bush, for sure, but the ordinary people are its roses, and they are the beautiful story of this book. I. LOST AMERICA (The Bad News) CHAPTER 1 BushCo Lily Tomlin says she worries that the man who invented Muzak might be thinking of inventing something else. Iím with her on that, but it ranks only a single ì!î on my personal worry chart. Here are some things I find more worrisome, in rising order of alarm: !! Itíll be discovered that the cause of cancer is: Beer. !!! What if the song is right? What if the Hokey Pokey really is ìwhat itís all aboutî? !!!! One word: BushCheneyRumsfeldAshcroftRidge&Co. Aaauuuughh!!!! These people are dangerous. Theyíre also nuts. Hereís a small starter package of their nuttiness, just to give you a taste of whatís to come: ï The Bushites heard that the economy is wringing out working families like an old worn-out dishrag, so they said: No problem, weíll help you by eliminating taxes paid by rich people. ï Theyíve invented perverse phrases of newspeak, such as ìanticipatory self-defense,î which give them rhetorical cover to roam anywhere around the globe like Attila the Nuclear Hun to kill people they donít like and take their oilónow, when reporters ask Bush if weíre going to war he has to ask: In which country? ï They have an environmental policy thatís so polluted they actually tried to designate a California waste dump as a National Historic Landmarkóyou know, Mount Vernon, Monticello, Walden Pond, the Frenso Municipal Sanitary Landfill. ï Theyíre so imperious that even when Dick Cheney finally was forced by a court to release some of the documents disclosing the rampant corporate cronyism in his secret energy policy task force, the White House blanked out most sentences in the eleven thousand pages released, including one paper that was entirely blanked out except for this concluding sentence: ìI hope this information was helpful.î Imagine what theyíd be doing if theyíd actually won the election! I can hear some of you saying, Hightower, how can you hear what weíre saying when youíre not in the room with us? No, no, I donít hear you saying that, I hear you saying, So whatíd you expect, Hightower? Itís a Republican administration, for cryiní out loud! Republican presidents have favored big business since the day Abe got shot and they discovered robber barons. So whatís new? Besides, bubba, that bunch of Clinton Democrats plays the same footsie with the money bags. Didja forget the Lincoln Bedroom? NAFTA? All the other corporate favors? Fair enough. The White House has been the Corporate Feed & Greed Store for some time. But this is much bigger. The Bushites are something else again, a whole other species of political schemers proceeding at an entirely new level of seriousness and sophistication, fully intending to implement an ideological laissez-faire agenda developed during the past thirty years or so in various corporate-funded think tanks and right-wing groups. Theyíre not merely doing favors, giving payback, danciní with them that brung íem, or any of the other colloquial expressions of Business As Usualógiving a subsidy here, a special tax break there, a regulatory twist back over here. This bunch is business-way-more-than-usual. MEET YOUR GOVERNMENT Are you old enough to remember when there was no EMS? It seems now as though these no- nonsense professional lifesavers have been around forever, rushing with lights flashing and sirens wailing to get to car wrecks, heart attack victims, and other emergencies. What a terrific job these men and women do. We all benefit by having them at the readyóincluding many a corpulent old hater of ìBiggummintî whoís lived to thank his or her lucky stars that this chunk of public spending was available to haul their carcass to the hospital in time. Until about thirty years ago, though, EMS didnít exist. Instead, funeral homes ran the ambulances. Yes, the undertaker! Talk about a conflict of interest. Wreck on the highway? Call the boys over at the Kingdom of Eternal-Slow-Motion Funeral Home to head on over. (Owner: ìOK, Joe Bill, weíve got a blood splotch out on 390 West, but donít you go running red lights and such, you hear?î) People died, not from the crash, but because the ambulance didnít get there in time, or when it did, the driver didnít know any lifesaving procedures, so...plunk...another body for the undertakerís slab. Not since those days have I seen such a big oozing conflict of interest as we now have in the White House. BushCheneyRumsfeld and the rest are not simply dutiful servants trying to please corporate interests, as previous administrations have been, THEY ARE THE CORPORATE INTERESTS. I believe they should have to wear those peel-off greeting badges that conventioneers stick on their lapels: ìHI! Iím Dick from Halliburton.î ìIím Rummie from Searle & Company and General Instrument.î ìIím Norm Mineta from Lockheed Martin.î ìAnn Veneman from Calgene, Inc.î ìAndy Card, here, from General Motors.î ìMitch Daniels from Eli Lilly.î ìDonnie Evans of Brown, Inc.î ìIím Elaine Chao with Bank of America, Northwest Airlines, Dole Foods, Clorox, Columbia/HCA Healthcare, andógolly, they just donít give you enough room on these badges, do they?î Donít forget George himself, who hails from the executive suites of Arbusto Energy, Spectrum 7, Harken Energy, and Texas Rangers, Inc. From the start and by design, this was Bush Incorporated. Of course, Bushís handlers ran it through their spin cycle so it wouldnít seem like what it was, instead focusing on the cabinetís physical diversity: ìItís America,î they cried as the cabinet was introduced. Looky there: four women (count íem, four!), two African Americans, a Japanese American, a Lebanese American, a Chinese American, andóomigoshóeven a Democrat American! What strings all of this apparent diversity together, however, is the corporate connection. Practically every cabinet member has spent a lifetime advancing the interests of corporations over those of working families, consumers, small farmers, the poor, the environment, and ordinary taxpayersóthe peopleís interests . With one yank of the string, all that diversity snaps taut with corporate homogeneity. Looking at the cabinetís four CEOs, two corporate lobbyists, and a flock of loyal corporate board members, one business newsletter hailed it as ìan all-star boardroom.î Swell. Except that this is supposed to be the cabinet of a democratic country, not of a corporation, and such a country dangerously restricts itself if itís guided by people whose experiences and outlook do not go beyond the bottom line of self-serving, profit-seeking corporations. As weíve learned the hard way from Enron, WorldCom, Bushís own Harken Energy, and many more, the boardroom is not even good at governing a corporation, much less a bustling, sprawling, rambunctious, ornery, restless, fluid, truly diverse, and determinedly democratic nation like ours. Tell me if Iím out of line here, but shouldnít there be at least one cabinet member who actually needs the job? And how about choosing three or four from among those of us whose only corporate connection is that we get monthly bills. Two-thirds of us Americans get paid less than $50,000 a year. Whereís our seat? This is a job that pays $171,000 a year, yet virtually every cabinet appointee goes out of his way to say that taking ìgovernment payî is a personal sacrifice for him, a step down, as though heís a little embarrassed. Iíd like to hear one appointee shout, ìZowee! Order that new dress, momma, weíre in the high cotton now.î And what about these people? ï 33 million Americans now live in povertyó8 million more than twenty-five years ago. ï 41 million Americans have no health coverageó6 million more than a decade ago. ï 9.6 million Americans have no jobsó2 million more than when Bush came to office. How about this: If they wonít give working families and poor folks a seat at the big table, maybe they could set up a small table on the side. My parents did that when I was just a little scamp. When company came over for supper, there wouldnít be enough room for us kids at the dining table, so my folks would set up a card table. It was something , which is way more than weíre getting now. The cabinet was only the beginning. Bush & Co. also have looped their corporate string throughout the government, posting corporate executives, consultants, and lobbyists to practically all of the key operational positions in every agency. You hear about the cabinet officials, but these are the faces that rarely surface, the people down in the inner works of our government who wield the monkey wrenches, grease cans, crowbars, drills, and power saws to jury-rig the system. There are scores of them, and their corporate bias thoroughly permeates and dominates the machinery of public affairs. Are there no talented consumer, labor, environmental, and other public representatives to fill these posts? Well, yes, of course. But somehow or other, the Bushites havenít gotten around to appointing any of them. Instead, itís an all-corporate cast. Hereís just a few of the corporations that now have their very own executive or trusted hireling wearing the hat of an undersecretary, general counsel, assistant secretary, director, or some other powerful government official: Aerospace Corporation GTE/Verizon Communications American Airlines Huntsman Corporation British-American Tobacco IBM Carnival Cruise Line Integrated Systems Charles Schwab Interwest Mining ConAgra Lockheed Martin Edison Electric Monsanto Energy Corporation of America Northrop Grumman Energy West Mining Occidental Petroleum Enron Raytheon Ernst & Young Sensis Corp. ExxonMobil Tesoro Petroleum General Electric Union Pacific What say we meet a couple of these corporately connected public servants? John D. Graham Hereís a fellow who might already have touched you personally, though he wouldnít have left any fingerprints. John heads a nerdy operation called the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the White House Office of Management and Budget. Letís see, the acronym of thatíd be OIRAWHOMB, which can be rearranged as an anagram to spell BIG KIBOSH. Thatís what Graham isóthe guy in charge of putting the kibosh on regulations designed to protect our health from things like asbestos poisoning, toxic emissions, and whatnot. Gosh, why would he do that? Because he wakes up every morning and takes a couple of lids of LSD, which has turned him into a dangerous, hallucinogenic freak. (Just kidding! Call off the lawyers! I was only seeing if you were paying attention!) Actually, the LSD explanation is not one dot weirder than the reality, which is that Graham is besotted with an antigovernment, antipublic ideology and has found a way to convert his political extremism into a profitable career fronting for corporations that sicken and kill us with their products and carefree sloppiness. What hole did Graham crawl out of? A place called the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, which he directed, doing reports on the health risk of everything from secondhand smoke to the dioxins that spew from chemical plants. Well, that sounds pretty academicky, like heís a legitimate independent research scientist. Heís not a scientist at all, just another doctrinaire policy geek. As for his independence, Grahamís center is funded by more than one hundred corporations, including these specimens: Aetna, Alcoa, Amoco, ARCO, Bethlehem Steel, Boise Cascade, BP, Chevron, Ciba-Geigy, CITGO, Coca-Cola, Dow, DuPont, Eastman Kodak, Exxon, Ford, GE, GM, Georgia-Pacific, Goodyear, International Paper, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft, Merck, Mobil, Monsanto, Nippon, Novartis, PepsiCo, Pfizer, Pharmacia Upjohn, Procter & Gamble, Schering-Plough, Shell, Texaco, 3M, Union Carbide, and Westinghouse. The companies contribute generously because Graham delivers reports that almost always support them, usually without bothering to mention that they funded his ìresearch.î For example, when the EPA finally reported that dioxin is an extraordinarily potent chemical that can cause everything from cancer to birth defects, Graham rushed out as an ìexpertî to criticize the EPA and pooh-pooh the risk, declaring to the media: ìItís a shame when a mother worries about toxic chemicals, and yet her kids are running around unvaccinated and without bicycle helmets.î No mention to the media that his center is funded by forty-eight different corporations that pollute our environment with dioxin. This is Bushís choice to be the czar who oversees the entire regulatory process of the governmentís executive departments. No important health, safety, environmental, or other rule to protect you and me from corporate excess can be issued by the EPA or other executive agency without getting stamped by Johnís signet ring. Yet, his appointment to head OIRA caused little media stir, and you probably know nothing about it. But the corporate executives and lobbyists knew about it, and their beaming smiles would have lit up the sky on the darkest night of an Arctic winter. Among those beaming the brightest would have been the honchos of W.R. Grace & Co., the chemical and asbestos giant. They had a problem. Millions of American homes, schools, and businessesóperhaps yoursóare insulated with a product named Zonolite, made from a substance containing an extremely lethal asbestos fiber that came from W.R. Graceís mine in Libby, Montana. Hundreds of the Libby miners and their families have died from asbestosis, hundreds more are diagnosed with it, and thousands are sickened by it. This is nasty stuffóbreathing even a little can cause major health problems. The Zonolite insulation poses no problem if itís not disturbed. Thatís the good news. Bad news is that it takes very little to disturb it. Bumping the walls as you sweep your floor or doing work in the attic can shake loose a mess of fibers. Itís such a problem that Bushís EPA administrator, Christine Todd Whitman, whoís not exactly a tiger on corporate wrongdoing, was so alarmed that she was prepared in April of í02 to issue a national health warning about Zonolite. Do you recall getting any warning? You didnít, because just days before Whitman was to go to the media, John Graham and his OIRAWHOMB put the kibosh on her warning. It seems that Grahamís obligation is not to us pollutees, who might want to know about Zonoliteís danger to our families, but to the bottom line of the polluter, W.R. Grace. Under what authority had Graham single-handedly quashed such an important effort by a cabinet officer to protect the public health? No response from OIRAWHOMB. Had he been contacted by Grace officials? Silence. An agency spokeswoman told an inquiring reporter: ìWe donít discuss predecisional deliberations.î There you have itóyour tax dollars at work, Bush style. Nancy Victory What a good name! Sounds like a comic book heroine. But, no, sheís for real, and whether you think sheís a heroine or not depends on which end of the cell phone youíre on. If youíre on the consumer end, not. But if youíre an executive or lobbyist for Cingular Wireless, SBC Communications, Verizon, or one of the other big sellers of cell phone plans, definitely yes. Nancy is based these days at the Commerce Department, where she heads an outfit youíre not likely to have heard of: the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Sounds awfully boring. But as administrator of NTIA, Nancy packs some punch, for it makes her the Bushitesí point person on telecommunications policy. Thereís lots of dough riding on the policy decisions sheís makingódough thatís ultimately going to come out of the pockets of Mr. and Ms. Youknowwho. Now I know this will surprise you: Guess who Nancy worked for before joining Bush Incorporated? The cell phone makers and marketers! Isnít this fun? Her former law firm, Wiley Rein & Fielding, is one of the biggest in Washington, specializing in communications regulation and representing such clients as Verizon and SBC. Her husband still is a partner there, which puts a nice family touch to the story. After Bush appointed Ms. Victory, she was feted at a private reception by her old corporate pals. The party was hosted and paid for by the top lobbyists for Cingular, SBC, and Motorola. Asked how much they spent and whether the money came from corporate funds, both the Cingular and Motorola lobbyists said, and I quote them here, ìI donít remember.î Ah, but Nancy remembered them. Only ten days after her gala reception , she woke up in a gay and generous mood, ate a big bowl of Special K, went to the office, and zipped off a formal NTIA letter to the FCC demanding the immediate repeal of a regulation that had long bothered her friends at Cingular, SBC, and so forth. In essence, what this repeal would do is to let these big players divide the territory and eliminate pesky competitors. Two weeks after her letter was sent , the FCC did just as Nancy had asked. Amazing. Who says government is slow and unresponsive? Confronted by the curious chronology at play here, Nancy indignantly says that any suggestion that there was a connection is ì ridiculous .î She also declined to identify industry guests who attended her reception, simply saying, ìTheyíre my friends.î Exactly. And thatís whatís wrongóNancy and her friends are running our government as though itís their private party. CORPORATIONS ìRî US What we have here is a government thatís as thoroughly corporatized as your typical shopping mall. Most malls today have the same collection of stores, dominated by Starbucks, The Gap, McDonaldís, Barnes & Noble, Toys ìRî Us, CompUSA, Target, Wal-Mart, and other nationally branded names that use their deep-pocket financing, predatory marketing, and raw political muscle to overpower local businesses and communities. Now, this same assertion of corporate power, this same uniformity, is malling our entire government, branding it as corporate Americaís own. Such uniformity is bad enough in the marketplace, but itís intolerable in a government thatís supposed to represent all of the people. Some sayóin fact, Bush and Cheney did say when they were campaigningóthat government ought to operate like a business. Oh, which one? Enron? WorldCom? But itís not just a matter of the disgraced corporations. No corporation is a model for how government should operate . Corporations are rigid, top-down, autocratic hierarchies in which executive actions are delivered as fiats to be implemented unquestioningly. Checks and balances are a jokeóthe board of directors, for example, is a brother-in-law job, handpicked by the CEO. Openness? Corporations are towers of secrecy, in which all information is considered a proprietary asset to be doled out only in approved snippets vetted through the PR department, keeping as much as possible from employees, investors, customers, auditors, regulators, lawmakers, the media, and We the People. If this way of operating sounds familiar, itís because this has been the mode of the Bushites from day one. We really shouldnít be surprised that theyíre so determinedly secretive, so bald in their grab for power, so disdainful of Congress and anyone who tries to question them, so astonishingly audacious in their assertion of an agenda that benefits very few people and that few support. Having spent their professional lives within the tightly controlled executive-suite culture, they come to government with the narrowest of outlooks, the most privileged of experiences, and the bottom-line arrogance of executives who want to do what they wantóand everyone else should just get the hell out of their way. SNOW JOB Last December, George gave America a Christmas present: A brand new economic team! I really was hoping for a new bike, but instead you and I and all of us were presented with John Snow, Steve Friedman, and Bill Donaldson. It was like getting socks, belts, and underwear, but George looked into the TV cameras and said firmly that we should be grateful, for these three gifts were going to ìfixî the economy. Yes, but for whom? As a hotel worker once said to me, ìI live on a fixed incomeóand Iím looking for the ones who fixed it.î She might check out these three fixers and think about what theyíll deliver for her: Donaldson , chosen to head the SEC, which is supposed to be our watchdog against fraud by Wall Street firms. He was CEO of one of the biggest of the Wall Street firms, Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenretteówhich presently happens to be under SEC investigation for fraud. Friedman , chosen to be Bushís top economic advisor. He was cochairman of the huge investment house of Goldman Sachs, where he was a leader in the merge- and-purge boom of the í80s and í90s, which cost hundreds of thousands of workers their jobs, lessened competition, raised prices for consumers, and hurt shareholders. Snow , chosen to be our countryís top economic official as treasury secretary. He was CEO of the nationís largest railroad company, CSX Corporation, where he presided over a 53 percent dive in the companyís stock price while raising his own pay by 69 percent, at the same time he was slashing the health care and life insurance benefits for CSX retirees. This trio is now making the governmental decisions over all aspects of our economic lives, setting the rules and rewriting the laws concerning our wages, pensions, taxes, credit cards, mortgages, small-business loans, bankruptcies, and so forth. Sheeshótwo Wall Streeters and a railroader. Thanks, George! I wonder why he didnít just shove an ice pick up our noses. I ask you: Whose side do you figure Snow, Friedman, and Donaldson will be on when it comes to the big decisions affecting you, like whether Congress should cut the taxes on the super rich by another half a trillion dollars or put those public funds into something more productive that you could use, like a cut in your payroll taxes or an affordable health care plan for all? But we already know the answer to that oneóall three were early and eager endorsers of George Wís voodoo, hoodoo, woowoo trickle-down tax plan for the wealthy, whichóSURPRISE!óincludes them. Itís not that theyíre mean men. I have no doubt that each one loves puppies, adores his grandchildren, and tears up at Frank Capra movies. Theyíre probably devout churchgoers, too, and give to the fund for orphans. But being softhearted or hard has nothing to do with their views on policy. Thatís about business, and, well, they donít see the world from the same perspective as you and I do. We look out at life from the street level. Theyíre always looking down from on high. Itís different. Now Iím hearing you again. Iím hearing you say, Whaddaya mean theyíre different from us, Hightower? Give us an example we can sink our teeth into . Okey-dokey. Take a squint at Mr. Railroad Man. him: John Snow wrote a clause into his CSX contract that would pay him $15 million if he left the corporation to take a position in ìpublic service.î Prescient, no? And tacky. It was so stinky that when Bush called him to serve, the threat of media exposure compelled him to reject the 15 mil, magnanimously saying that he certainly didnít want to appear to be getting a corporate subsidy to do government work. Oh? So whyíd he write it into his contract? you: It wouldnít occur to you to expect such a payment, and even if you did, youíd be laughed out of the building and pelted with cabbages. him: In 1996, CSX loaned $25 million to Snow so he could buy a big chunk of the companyís stock, which he hoped to ride to glory. Unfortunately for Snow, under his guidance of the company, CSX stock began to plummet. So he took the hit, right? Get serious. Heís the CEO, so heís bulletproof. In 2000, the board took back its now devalued shares, forgave the $25 million owed by Snow, and gave back his down payment! After Snowís cabinet appointment, a White House spokeswoman was asked about the ethics of this deal. She said curtly that it was ìlegal.î you: Youíre not an insider, so you donít get itóyou neither get a loan nor do you ìgetî the game theyíre playing. him: Although he cut back on the pensions of CSX retirees, he got the board to give him pension credit for forty-four years on the jobóeven though he was there only twenty- five years. you: Rank-and-file workers get only one year of pension credit for one year worked and not a minute extra, you slacker. him: Snowís retirement pay will be based not on his salary alone, but also on his bonuses and on the value of 250,000 shares of CSX stock that the board gave to him. you: Are you crazy? You think weíre gonna give stock to you? You think this is some charity, you slug? Your pension pay is based on your wages, period. him: Eternal wealth is Johnís future, for his pension adds up to $2.5 million. A year. Every year. Until he dies. Guaranteed. you: Eternal harassment is your future, for weíre not ever gonna stop whacking at your monthly retirement stipend, unless we just decide to loot the entire fund before you croak. him: Snow gets promoted by Bush to be in charge of Americaís economic policy. you: Good luck, chump. Thinking about Snow, I thought of the British House of Lords. Iím an aficionado of the pomp, queerness (yes, itís OK to use this word in this contextólighten up!), and general atmosphere of buffoonery in the House of Lords. Assorted officials there wear what look to be pieces of crinoline petticoats thrusting from their throats, they have various medals and fobs hanging from their sixteenth-century garb, and they are given such marvelous official titles as the ìGentleman Usher of the Black Rod.î Yep, he does walk around toting a black rod thatís about four feet long. I think it would be splendid if the royal lords of our society had such titles. Instead of treasury secretary, for example, Lord Snow could be the Gentleman Usher of the Golden Shaft, and be required to carry it with him wherever he goes. The Bushitesí domination and transformation of the governing apparatus is so antithetical to our democratic values, yet so thorough, that we no longer have The Government of the People of the United States of America. But, what the hell, I say we go all the way with it. I mean, what kind of name is ìThe Government of the People of the United States of Americaî anyway? Thatís so yesterday. We could use some marketing savvy here, some twenty-first-century identity branding that can connect to the wired, hip, commercial culture that is ìtoday.î Letís get with the times, people! You donít see phone companies, for example, sticking with stodgy old names like Bell Atlantic Telephone Corporation, do you? Noóthey become ìVerizon.î Now thatís got some zip to it! (Alright, itís not really a word and no one can figure out what it is or what itís selling, and the companyís stock price is down by half in the three years since the name change, but letís not fall into the trap of negativity here.) So letís rebrand. Forget The Government of the People of YadaYadaYada. Letís call it something consumers can remember, something thatíll look good on Washingtonís marble walls, something punchy and true to the spirit of the Bush government. Letís call it: BUSHCO! NICK GOES HOME How can you not feel sorry for Nick Calio? Heís a guy with T-bone tastes, but for the first years of the Bush Administration, he was having to settle for Spamórelatively speaking. He was Wís top White House lobbyist, paid a scant $145,000 a year (plus a chauffeured limo, a wining and dining expense account, full health plan, platinum pension, etc., but letís not get picky). Just before last Christmas, however, Nick left government service. Too little money, he said. Well, youíve got to understand where heís coming from. Before joining Bush, he was pulling down about a million a year as partner in a boutique lobbying firm, carrying water for the likes of Arthur Andersen and ARCO. He wears monogrammed, tailor-made, French-cuffed shirts that cost more than your monthly rent. Heís got a $1.5 million Washington home, with a private wine cellar that he likes to keep stocked with the good stuff. Nick lives large, and, well, you just canít make those ends meet on $145K. So, he went back home, back to his beloved K Street, the avenue of the big-time corporate lobbyists. Heís now the ìsenior vice president for global government affairsî for Citigroup, the financial conglomerate that finds itself under congressional and SEC investigation for its hanky-panky with Enron, as well as for other pecadillos. Citigroup needs a friend who has friends in high places, and Nickís just the man. As White House lobbyist, for example, not only did he rub elbows with the prez and all the top agency heads, but he also was in charge of parsing out coveted favors to key members of Congressóthings like invitations to state dinners, trips with George aboard Air Force One, , and use of the presidential box at the Kennedy Center. He wonít say how much Citigroup is paying for his ìexperience and advice,î but heíll have no worries about stocking that wine cellar. Asked if he thought it was ethical for a corporate lobbyist to swoosh through the revolving door into government service, then swoosh right back out to private lobbying, profiting from his government connections, Nick got huffy: ìI think thatís a silly criticism. What do you want? People going into government who know nothing about it? You need people going in who know the issues.î And the game. THE DISARMING POWER OF GEORGE Why have the media been so laid-back, so unconcerned or even unaware that a corporate coup is happening in plain sight? An obvious reason is that the owners controlling todayís conglomerated, centralized media are part of the coup, profiting enormously from it. Another is that the media and much of the public have had their eyes diverted from the coup by the sound and fury of Bushís war drums. September 11 and Saddam Hussein have provided ample cover and rationalization for the Bushitesí relentless concentration of governmental authority. But another is the ìPower of George.î Itís stupid to call him stupid. True, he doesnít have the brain muscle for any heavy lifting, but thatís not why heís there. He knows who he is, knows his role, and heís playing it like a Shakespearean star. The corporate takeover of the U.S. government is ugly. If, say, Dick Cheney were the face of such an un-American power grab, everyone would see it...and shriek! Cheneyís got a smile like a landlord whoís just evicted another widow. But George is, well, George. So affable, so ìWhat, me worry?î He comes across not as the pouty, petulant, spoiled frat boy that close associates and family know him to beóthe inner child who used to stuff frogs with firecrackers and blow them up for laughs*óbut as regular olí George. If you just casually watch him, you think: He might not have it all together, but he surely means no harm, does he? Remember his pretzel attack? Just into the second year of his presidency, he was home alone in the White House one day, stretched out on the couch with his dogs, Spot and Barney, taking in a football game on the telly, whenó gckkhkxxx óhe got a pretzel stuck in his throat, choked, fainted, fell to the floor, and got a bright red rug burn on his cheek. Next day, he sent a big bag of pretzels to the press with a note saying, ìChew slowly.î Youíve got to like that. This is who heís always been. The oilmen who gave him a sweetheart deal at Harken Energy, and the corporate heavies who essentially gave him a partnership in the Texas Rangers, were not bringing him on board for his brain or management acumen. They were buying a front man with a bankable name and a likable personality. Same in politics. He has the persona to soften the blow and distract from the theft. Thatís why the CEOs and lobbyists were so wildly enthusiastic about a do-nothing Texas governor that they put up $113 million for his campaign. *No, Iím not making this up. ìWe were terrible to animals,î boyhood friend Terry Throckmorton laughingly said in a New York Times profile on George W. Terry noted that a low spot behind Bushís house would fill with water after a good rain, and thousands of frogs would come out. ìWeíd put firecrackers in the frogs and throw them and blow them up.î Ah, the joys of childhood. Excerpted from Thieves in High Places: They've Stolen Our Country and It's Time to Take It Back by Jim Hightower All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.