Available:*
Library | Call Number | Status |
---|---|---|
Searching... Bayport Public Library | 338.4 WAR | Searching... Unknown |
Searching... Hardwood Creek Library (Forest Lake) | 338.4 WAR | Searching... Unknown |
Searching... Stillwater Public Library | 338.4 WAR | Searching... Unknown |
Bound With These Titles
On Order
Summary
Summary
If a piece of individually wrapped cheese retains its shape, colour, and texture for years, what does it say about the food we eat and feed our children? Former New York Timesbusiness reporter and mother Melanie Warner decided to explore that question when she observed the phenomenon of the indestructible cheese. She began an investigative journey that takes her to research labs, food science departments, and factories around the country. What she discovered provides a rare, eye-opening-and sometimes disturbing-account of what we're really eating. Warner looks at how decades of food science have resulted in the cheapest, most abundant, most addictive, and most nutritionally devastating food in the world, and she uncovers startling evidence about the profound health implications of the packaged and fast foods that we eat on a daily basis.
From breakfast cereal to chicken subs to nutrition bars, processed foods account for roughly 70 percent of our nation's calories. Despite the growing presence of farmers' markets and organic produce, strange food additives are nearly impossible to avoid. Combining meticulous research, vivid writing, and cultural analysis, Warnerblows the lid off the largely undocumented-and lightly regulated-world of chemically treated and processed foods and lays bare the potential price we may pay for consuming even so-called "healthy" foods.
Reviews (3)
Publisher's Weekly Review
This eye-opening expose of the food industry in America was conceived after Warner, while working as a journalist for The New York Times, made a trip to the supermarket and purchased a rather unhealthy amount of packaged foods in an attempt to see what would happen to them once all the expiry dates came and went. The results, as she states, were rather anti-climactic as she discovered that the foods were pretty much the same. But this left her asking one question: What do expiry dates really mean, and is "food" really food anymore? Narrated by Ann Marie Lee, this absolutely fascinating-and rather infuriating-look at what society is really eating is a must for any responsible adult. Lee's delivery is simple and understated. She lets the shocking discoveries speak for themselves and her tone mirrors that of the text: she sounds like a concerned citizen who simply wants to know why we are being misled about what we eat. A Scribner hardcover. (Apr.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Choice Review
Pandora's Lunchbox addresses the history, personalities, motivations, techniques, and problems associated with the development of processed food, that type of sustenance that George Orwell might have referred to as "unfood." Processed food is housed mainly in the center aisles of supermarkets and materializes in such delicacies as Go-Gurt, Sno Balls, and American processed cheese product. Business journalist Warner introduces the pioneers in the processed food movement, including J. L. Kraft and John Harvey Kellogg, and provides a primer on various food processing techniques, from gun puffing to extrusion. She argues that the main motivations for introducing processed food into the American diet were the profitability of food manufacturers and the convenience demanded by the American housewife as she made the transition into the work force. The book also discusses additives, including flavor extracts, enzymes, and vitamins. The chapter on vitamins sends the especially disturbing message that it is not easy to "put Humpty Dumpty together again" since processing reintroduces these constituents of whole food as synthetic isolates, which may have harmful health effects. The book is informative, fluent, engaging, and well researched. A good companion volume, particularly to the chapters on additives, is Bee Wilson's excellent history of food fraud, Swindled (CH, Apr'09, 46-4407). Summing Up: Highly recommended. All levels/libraries. D. M. Gilbert formerly, Maine Maritime Academy
Kirkus Review
The story of what happens to processed foods before they reach our plate. What is lost from, or added to, factory-produced food in the quest for uniformity, flavor, cohesiveness, moistness and the ability to withstand temperature extremes? To answer this question, journalist Warner examined Kraft prepared-cheese product, Subway's sandwich bread, breakfast cereals, soybean oil, chicken tenders and other foods. The author clearly explains the procedures and chemicals used to keep mass-produced food consistent and unspoiled, and she identifies the paradox of the food-processing industry: "that nutrition and convenience are sometimes deeply at odds with one another." The problem, she writes, with the "wholesale remaking of the American meal is that our human biology is ill-equipped to handle it." Our bodies metabolize food much as they did in the Stone Age, long before the plethora of new ingredients that make meal preparation easier. While we assume the FDA regulates the estimated 5,000 food additives used in processed foods, the food industry is innovating so fast, it is hard to keep up. Warner outlines the loopholes and gaps in a regulatory system in which only several hundred additives are researched and controlled. Americans also now get more synthetic nutrients in their diets than naturally occurring ones. These vitamins may not be as beneficial since they lack the suite of natural compounds found in whole foods. Warner includes chapters on soy and the changing world of fats, meat extenders, flavorings, and early pioneers in food testing and regulation. Some of the chapters meander a bit--e.g., an excellent chapter on regulating food additives ventures off into enzyme use in baking. Warner's take-home message is to seek out the least-processed of the processed foods. A well-researched, nonpreachy, worthwhile read.]] Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Excerpts
Excerpts
Pandora's Lunchbox Introduction A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO, I went to the supermarket and bought an overflowing armful of cereal boxes and cookie packages. I'd started writing about the food industry for the New York Times not long before, and I'd decided to test whether those expiration dates printed on packages actually meant anything. I'd always wondered what happened to food after the expiration dates passed. Would the cookies turn green or taste like old shoes? Would bugs crawl out of the cereal? I tucked the boxes and crinkly bags away in my kitchen for nearly a year. The dates printed on the packages came and went, and when I opened them, the results were fairly unremarkable: my cereal and cookies looked and tasted perfectly normal, almost as if I'd just bought them. I started wondering how long other foods would last. My experiment expanded--frozen dinners, kids' lunches, loaves of bread, processed cheese, hot dogs, pudding, and Pop-Tarts. I brought home samples of fast-food burgers, fries, chicken sandwiches, and chicken nuggets. At the time I was working from home, and I had to keep everything out of reach of our two young sons, who were never able to understand why they couldn't eat just one Oreo or have a taste of a Pop-Tart. I worried that my work area might succumb to some sort of awful infestation. I pictured fruit flies or those tiny worms that get into the forgotten bag of flour in the back corner of the top cabinet. But none of this happened. Much of my collected food stubbornly refused to decay, even after as many as six years--far beyond expiration dates. I wondered what had happened to this food to make it so eternal, so unappealing to the mold and bacteria that normally feast on ignored leftovers and baked goods. It seemed to me that the dates printed on the package had little to do with true "expiration." What did those dates actually mean? How was it possible that foods that seemed perfectly edible could be immune to natural processes of decomposition? What were we actually feeding our kids? Around our house, my experiments were regarded as little more than mildly amusing, sort of weird, and definitely gross. My food collection was a funny little hobby. Until the guacamole incident. On a Fourth of July trip out of town in 2011, my husband had returned from the grocery store with a tub of "fresh guacamole." "They made an announcement over the loudspeaker that they had just made it over at the deli, so I went and got some," he said proudly. The container had a haphazardly applied sticker on it, indicating that it very well could have been "made fresh" by one of the store's white-coated deli workers. But there was something unusual about the ingredients: Hass avocados, salt, ascorbic acid, citric acid, xanthan gum, amigum, text-instant, tomatoes, yellow onion, jalapeño, cilantro. I was knee-deep in research on food additives, but I'd never heard of amigum or text-instant. I went to the store and bought another tub, tucking it into our fridge at home and figuring I'd look into those strange ingredients later. Mostly I forgot about it. Then, nine months later, my mom, who lives with us in Boulder, Colorado, announced she'd tried some of the guacamole. We'd just had a birthday party for one of our boys, and I'd bought some dips from Whole Foods. I hoped that was what she was referring to, but I was pretty sure all of it was gone. My mom had tried the other guacamole, the Fourth of July stuff, of course. "It was a little spicy," she declared. My food museum was nauseating, but it had never occurred to me that it could actually sicken anyone. I was concerned because, as an older person, my mom has a higher risk of contracting a life-threatening food-borne illness. Mom assured me everything would be fine; she is nothing if not an unrelenting optimist. Amazingly, though, she was right. Not even an intestinal rumbling. She'd only tried a little, thank God. Some people probably would have looked at that tub of green goop and not eaten any of it. It was brown around the edges and didn't look particularly fresh. But others might have done exactly what my mom did, and mistaken it for something edible. Even homemade guacamole tends to darken after a few days, and what my mom ate had none of the red flags that help guide us in our decisions about whether or not to consume something. There was no mold and no bad smell. Like so much of the food we eat today, this immortal guacamole was not what it seemed. It had, in fact, been prepared--or assembled--by those deli workers, but not according to any recipe you'd use at home. It didn't look like a processed food, but that's exactly what it was. Along with the usual avocados, tomatoes, and onions, this guacamole had corn. Or corn manipulated beyond recognition so that it had been transformed into preservatives you can't taste, smell, or see. And then there was that "text-instant," as well as "amigum"--an ingredient that, I later learned, was even more bizarre than I could have imagined. And that is the story of so much of our food, it turns out. Although my mother instilled in me a healthy skepticism of processed foods growing up, allowing me very limited access to what she called "gooped-up" food, I had no idea just how tremendously technical our food production had become until my food experiments impelled me to take a closer look. What started as an earnest attempt to understand the true meaning of labeling on the packages of the foods so many of us eat became a larger journey that brought me inside the curious, intricate world of food science and technology, a place where food isn't so much cooked as disassembled and reassembled. Over the last century, such complex modes of production have ushered in a new type of eating, what we call processed food. Considering our vast and bewildering cornucopia of modern food choices, it's easy to forget that most of the items lining the inner aisles of the supermarket and the substances offered on fast-food menu boards simply didn't exist a century ago. The avalanche of prefabbed, precooked, often portable food into every corner of American society represents the most dramatic nutritional shift in human history. If we really are what we eat, then Americans are a different dietary species from what we were at the turn of the twentieth century. As a population, we ingest double the amount of added fats, half the fiber, 60 percent more added sugars, three and a half times more sodium, and infinitely greater quantities of corn and soybean ingredients than we did in 1909. The trouble with this wholesale remaking of the American meal is that our human biology is ill equipped to handle it. The way our bodies metabolize food is stuck somewhere in the Stone Age, long before the age of Cheez Whiz, Frosted Flakes, and Classic Chick'N Crisp fried in vegetable oil. Our many novel and high-tech manipulations of food destroy much of its essential geography, resulting in all sorts of unintended consequences. When we start taking food apart and industrially processing it, it often stops making biological sense. Processed food is even more ubiquitous than we think it is, in part because many products are designed to look as if they're not really processed at all. Subway's "fresh" sandwiches and the center aisles at Whole Foods, for instance, can both be quite perplexing. What are boxes of General Mills's Cascadian Farm's Fruitful O's and Cinnamon Crunch, if not Froot Loops and Cinnamon Toast Crunch by other names? Whole Foods co-founder John Mackey once acknowledged that some of what his stores sell is a "bunch of junk." And Subway's bread is not much more fresh and its meat no more whole than the bags of chips sitting up at the register. In total, some 70 percent of our calories come from this sort of (ultra) processed food. As an industry, this amounts to $850 million a year. And yet many foods that some might call processed in fact are not. At one point during my research, I attended an industry conference where the keynote discussion sought to tackle the merits of food processing. The example most often cited was pasteurized milk. Thank goodness for food scientists, the argument went, who save Americans from countless outbreaks of campylobacter and E. coli. Yes, thank goodness, but pasteurized milk, let's be clear, is not a processed food. Nor are frozen peas, canned beans, washed and boxed spinach, bags of baby carrots, packages of aged cheese, or boxes of raw, frozen ground beef shaped into hamburgers. At one point in time these products undoubtedly would have been heralded as newfangled creations. But today they barely register on the processing continuum and are not included in that 70 percent figure, which comes from a rigorous analysis done by the Brazilian nutrition scientist Carlos Monteiro. As a general rule--in a universe of tens of thousands of foods, there are always exceptions--a processed food is something that could not be made, with the same ingredients, in a home kitchen. Your home kitchen. I've written this book with the core belief that it's important to understand what we're eating. Some people won't want to know and would rather just keep eating all their favorite foods in peace, and this book isn't for them. But for those who believe in the virtues of a health-promoting diet for themselves and their families, few things are more important to understand than what happens to our food before it gets to our plates--whether it's arrived from the farm reasonably intact or has had a long, multibranched journey through the nutritionally devastating food-processing industrial complex. The aging guacamole notwithstanding, my mom, who read food labels with a discriminating eye long before it was fashionable, still does her best to avoid "gooped-up" food. She cooks most of what she eats and continues to survey ingredients (although apparently not if the food is already in the fridge). But her diet isn't one of deprivation. She eats meat and dairy and plenty of butter. She's never been lactose-free, sugar-free, caffeine-free, or fat-free. Nor does she have any plans to go gluten-free: the woman eats more bread than anyone. The only organizing principle of her diet is that she predominantly consumes things she would have recognized as food growing up in the thirties in Nova Scotia. She doesn't eat fast food; there was none back then. And she's never owned a microwave; they weren't available until the seventies. It seems to have worked well for her. In her early eighties, she's in near-perfect health, with no chronic conditions and no prescriptions to fill, something that, if you ask her, she will attribute in no small part to what she eats. "What you put into your body matters, Melanie," she told me more than once while I was in college, eating Pop-Tarts and pizza for dinner. "Just because it's edible doesn't mean it's good for you." As hard as it was to acknowledge at the time, she was on to something. Excerpted from Pandora's Lunchbox: How Processed Food Took over the American Meal by Melanie Warner All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
Table of Contents
Introduction | p. xi |
1 Weird Science | p. 1 |
2 The Crusading Chemist | p. 21 |
3 The Quest for Eternal Cheese | p. 38 |
4 Extruded and Gun Puffed | p. 51 |
5 Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again | p. 74 |
6 Better Living through Chemistry | p. 97 |
7 The Joy of Soy | p. 124 |
8 Extended Meat | p. 145 |
9 Why Chicken Needs Chicken Flavor | p. 167 |
10 Healthy Processed Foods | p. 181 |
11 Sit at Home and Chew | p. 203 |
Notes | p. 223 |
Acknowledgments | p. 247 |
Index | p. 251 |