Available:*
Library | Call Number | Status |
---|---|---|
Searching... R.H. Stafford Library (Woodbury) | 921 GERSON | Searching... Unknown |
Searching... Stillwater Public Library | 921 GERSON | Searching... Unknown |
Searching... Wildwood Library (Mahtomedi) | 921 GERSON | Searching... Unknown |
Bound With These Titles
On Order
Summary
Summary
A haunting chronicle of what endures when the world we know is swept away
On a day like any other, on a rafting trip down Utah's Green River, Stephane Gerson's eight-year-old son, Owen, drowned in a spot known as Disaster Falls. That night, as darkness fell, Stephane huddled in a tent with his wife, Alison, and their older son, Julian, trying to understand what seemed inconceivable. "It's just the three of us now," Alison said over the sounds of a light rain and, nearby, the rushing river. "We cannot do it alone. We have to stick together."
Disaster Falls chronicles the aftermath of that day and their shared determination to stay true to Alison's resolution. At the heart of the book is an unflinching portrait of a marriage tested. Husband and wife grieve in radically different ways that threaten to isolate each of them in their post-Owen worlds. ("He feels so far," Stephane says when Alison shows him a selfie Owen had taken. "He feels so close," she says.) With beautiful specificity, Stephane shows how they resist that isolation and reconfigure their marriage from within.
As Stephane navigates his grief, the memoir expands to explore how society reacts to the death of a child. He depicts the "good death" of his father, which reveals an altogther different perspective on mortality. He excavates the history of the Green River-rife with hazards not mentioned in the rafting company's brochures. He explores how stories can both memorialize and obscure a person's life-and how they can rescue us.
Disaster Falls is a powerful account of a life cleaved in two-raw, truthful, and unexpectedly consoling.
Author Notes
Stephane Gerson is a cultural historian and a professor of French studies at New York University. He has won several awards, including the Jacques Barzun Prize in Cultural History and the Laurence Wylie Prize in French Cultural Studies. He lives in Manhattan and Woodstock, New York, with his family. Visit his website at DisasterFalls.com.
Reviews (5)
Publisher's Weekly Review
In this wrenching memoir, Gerson, a historian and professor at New York University, grapples with unthinkable loss. He and his eight-year old son, Owen, were on a family rafting trip to Utah when father and son were thrown out of a small "duck boat" while navigating rapids on the Green River; Owen drowned. As he tries to find relief without dimming memory, Gerson turns to support groups, new routines, literature, history, and mysticism. Only with the death of his father two years later, and his wife's unexpected pregnancy, does Gerson begin to achieve a tentative acceptance of the unacceptable. Gerson writes honestly of his grief and guilt with an analytic distance that doesn't mask his suffering. Chapters narrating the events around Owen's death provide a counterpoint to those examining the accident's effects on Gerson's marriage, family, community, and his own sense of identity. The experience of 9/11 and a visit with his father to Belarus-where family members were murdered in the Holocaust-allow Gerson to contextualize his personal tragedy within the overwhelming history of human catastrophe. While asserting that one can never recover from the death of a child, Gerson evocatively describes the process of a struggle that allows him to continue living. (Jan.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
Booklist Review
Cultural historian Gerson could likely take on no greater challenge than to chronicle the cycle of grief that followed the tragic death of Owen, his and wife Alison's 8-year-old son, in 2008. Hands down, there is likely nothing that can so jarringly alter the culture within a family than the death of a child. It came at the pinnacle of an exhilarating family vacation rafting down Utah's Green River. At a section of particularly treacherous rapids, referred to as Disaster Falls, little Owen somehow either fell or was thrown from the raft. Rescue efforts failed. Gerson and Alison vowed that no matter what happened, they would not succumb to anger, as much for their sake as for the sake of their other son, 11-year-old Julian. They both knew the dangers of marital strife following the death of a child and strove against overwhelming emotional odds to hang on to each other. No tragedy occurs in a vacuum, and Gerson rounds out their story with his personal history, which includes the difficult relationship with and death of his father.--Chavez, Donna Copyright 2016 Booklist
New York Review of Books Review
STÉPHANE GERSON'S SLIM volume of anguished reflections circles around a terrible story. One summer, the Gerson family joins a group on a guided white-water rafting trip on a part of the Green River that runs near the border between Utah and Colorado - having never tried the sport. On the afternoon of the first day, they arrive at a section of the river whose ominous name was given by a 19th-century explorer to warn travelers: Disaster Falls. In spite of his inexperience, Gerson decides to take his 8-year-old son, Owen, over the falls in a light inflatable rubber kayak known, in rafting parlance, as a ducky. The guides have described it as less stable and more responsive to the churning waters, which Gerson thinks will be more exciting for Owen than the raft carrying his wife, Alison, and their older son. In an instant of inattention, Gerson allows the ducky to go too close to the rocks and it flips. The current sucks them under; Gerson breaks free, but Owen is caught in the rocks and drowns. By the time Owen's body is found, it is too late in the day to get out of the wilderness. In that long sleepless night in the tent Alison declares, "We cannot revisit the past." To a remarkable extent the couple seem to stick to the "pact" they "sealed in the tent." When, months later, Alison confesses one morning, "Sometimes I go back to the river," she does so in a whisper and immediately apologies. The pact, Gerson explains, permits them to express general sadness with each other, but not to "wonder out loud whether we would make it, or say things like my life is finished" or to "drag the other, unprepared, back to the accident." While the pact may be adaptive for them as a family, it proves an impossible commandment for a memoir. The book seems muffled by a protective code of silence that keeps Gerson from fully examining the agonizing issue of responsibility at the heart of the book and writing about what it means to have caused the death of a child he loved so much. Gerson is a historian - a professor of French studies at New York University and the author of several academic books. He is adept at conveying himself as a character struggling with grief, plunging the reader into the intimate eddies of emotion and his own, Alison's and their surviving son's attempts to create a new order as a family of three. He is a compelling and sympathetic character. But the book would benefit from more of Gerson's historian self: the writer who analyzes the material and tells us how he ultimately comes to regard his conflicted emotions. He writes movingly about his feelings of guilt and failure - his piercing belated insight that, above all else, "the benchmark for a good father" is ensuring his children survive to adulthood. But he also repeatedly quotes others assuring him that he is "in no way responsible," and it remains frustratingly unclear how he ultimately judges himself. In one sense, the accident is clearly his fault - the result of a risk he took - as well as the fault of the guides who assured him it would be O.K. But in a deeper sense the suffering, of course, is undeserved and, as he says, the death is cruelly "unfair." The nature of tragedy is that one ordinary human lapse of judgment can lead to untold suffering. The Gersons sue the guiding company on the grounds that although they signed the releases, they did not understand the risks. The rafting company's director testifies that the company does not "try to hold out to passengers that this is a safe trip." Indeed, Gerson himself had had a deep sense of foreboding looking at Disaster Falls that day - the sense that "a churned-up demon of destruction and terror" lurked beneath the waters. Yet he allowed himself to trust the guides' assurances over his own instincts. There is a certain kind of parent who is drawn to high-risk sports, and one might assume Gerson was a daredevil. Poignantly, the truth seems to have been the opposite: That day at the falls can be understood as a counterphobic attempt by the professor to overcome his own cautious temperament as well as his son's. Gerson writes that he came close to saying no to the rubber ducky that day at Disaster Falls, when both he and Owen were frightened, but he felt that "saying no would tell Owen to choose a safe and protected existence over an exposed and passionate one." THE BOOK is written in a fragmentary form with snippets of reflection or dialogue, moving toward and away from the day of the accident. Gerson is a gifted writer, and most of the prose is piercing, precise and graceful. Yet there are moments the writing seems odd, awkward or stilted, veering into grand, vaguely poetic metaphors that don't hold up, perhaps as if they might be translated from Gerson's native French. (For example, "Perhaps Owen uttered these words because his throat had opened so wide that it took in the crisp air and let out the dread and exhilaration that stand as the impossible horizon of a life that already seemed short and long at the same time.") The most powerful writing is the most direct, such as when Gerson is sucked under the current and thinks he may die: "The possibility of dying filled me with disbelief: Death in these circumstances? Why are we even here? And if I am about to die, then what is happening to Owen?" The one part of the book I found difficult to reread was written the most straightforwardly - a litany of regrets Alison writes to her son after he dies: "I am sorry you are gone. I'm sorry we couldn't save you, find you, protect you. . . . I am sorry you will never marry, have sex, kiss a girl. . . . I am sorry your front teeth didn't come in before you died. . . . I'm sorry my life is what it is - without you." Alison is increasingly convinced that she can communicate with Owen - that when she goes for a walk in the woods near their house, he is sending her signals in heart-shaped rocks she collects or rabbits that cross her path (she used to call him Bunny). Gerson's "internal battles with magical thinking" make him "resent Alison's certainty when it came to Owen's presence," and he fears she is moving closer to Owen and farther from him, disappearing into a psychic realm where he cannot follow. But ultimately, he aligns himself with his wife and adopts her conviction that Owen's death was in some way cosmically prefigured. Gerson points to several incidents before the accident: a day when he went into Owen's room and found himself imagining that Owen was dead and a night that Alison woke with a "terrifying presentiment." A few months after the accident a silver frame around a picture of Owen went inexplicably dark for half a second. People related that Owen had confided to them "that even though he looked like other children, he could see things they could not," such as red flashes and odd shapes on the carpet and walls, and that he was accompanied by "a benevolent force" that he could see from the corner of his eye. Perhaps Owen's struggles with insomnia were because "he was confronting these flashes and shapes along with the prospect of final solitude," Gerson decides and "had some acquaintance with death." Alison seeks out a medium who tells her that she has communicated with Owen and that he wants his parents to know the accident was not their fault. He knows the medium may be telling them what they want to hear, but finds "comfort in the story, forceful and necessary" and decides that "whether events on the river had taken place that way or not hardly mattered at that moment" because "Alison and I could choose to make this story our own; we could compose it together." What are we to make of this - an idea that seems to erase the tragedy in all of its wrongness and frame it, somehow, as part of Owen's nature and therefore, in some sense, meant to be? Certainly, bereaved parents should embrace any story that gets them through the day. But it's not clear how Gerson regards this story - as a convenient fiction or as his own assessment? Although there is much to admire in it, "Disaster Falls" is the rare book that would have been better longer, with these issues thoroughly explored. The book reads more like journal entries or notes toward a book rather than a finished project. But it is also a testament to its power that we long to know more and wish that Gerson had put it in a drawer until he was ready to fully examine the unbearable. MELANIE THERNSTROM is the author, most recently, of "The Pain Chronicles."
Kirkus Review
How the author and his family overcame the loss of a child.When his 8-year-old son Owen accidentally drowned on a family rafting trip, Gerson (French Studies/New York Univ.), his wife, Alison, and remaining son, Julian, were as shocked as they were grief-stricken. Owen's death, writes the author, was "at once a ripple in the flow of everyday life and a disruption of the entire universe." Desperate to understand his loss, Gerson went deep inside himself and began to write while Alison externalized her grief through exercise. As he imagined Owen growing up and old, the author obsessively revisited the day of Owen's death and the hours that preceded it, carefully skirting around the actual incident itself. The strain of his son's death eventually caused Gerson to develop a rash and then other symptoms of physical breakdown, including bowel irritation, a hernia, prostatitis, and tinnitus. The loss affected Gerson's relationship to Alison as well as the relationships each had to their respective parents. Needing comfort, it was as though they had "bec[o]me children again." Yet it also brought Gerson closer to his own history as the son of an American-born Jewish man whose own family escaped the Holocaust. A trip to Belarus with his father, Berl, and son made Gerson realize that "those who had failed to save loved ones did not necessarily live in shame or guilt." This epiphany helped him to not only look directly at Owen's death, but also see that he was not to blame for it. Berl's own "good death" not long afterward released Gerson from his past, which allowed him to share the words he had penned about Owen with Alison and relive the civil lawsuit that followed the tragedy. Keenly observed and deeply felt, this book is not only a powerful reflection on grief and loss, but also an intimately textured history of fathers and sons. An unflinchingly honest, moving memoir of loss and recovery. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Library Journal Review
This diamond-sharp book is both meticulous and breathtaking. With methodical pacing and painstaking detail, the author describes how his eight-year-old son Owen died in a rafting accident on Utah's Green River, at a place called Disaster Falls. It is evident that Gerson is driven by a desire to get it right, to tell the full story of the accident, including its aftermath and preceding events. And while he takes us to the precipice of the fatality, it's as if the accident is secondary to the larger story. This creates a narrative tension in the passage about the incident itself. Though we know the outcome, we hold our breath as he and Owen approach the falls in a raft: we hope that it will end differently. Gerson also connects these events to the loss of his father in the year after his son's death, and in this way offers a meditation on the connection between fathers and sons. VERDICT A beautiful book, even as it deals with unthinkable anguish. (Memoir, 10/17/16; ow.ly/5jnF308ccrE)-Rachael Dreyer, -Eberly Family Special -Collections Lib,. Pennsylvania State Univ. © Copyright 2017. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Excerpts
Excerpts
9781101906699|excerpt Gerson / DISASTER FALLS One Drew: Just a quick question: What is it like at home? Owen's former classmates--Drew and the others--sometimes asked us about the accident. More often, they recounted where they had been when they found out. This is how they told us his death had turned their lives upside down. Adults were not different, but most doubted that we wanted to know or else they feared saying the wrong thing so they tended to remain quiet. The few friends who took us back to that moment did so gingerly. They watched for our cues. With Alison, they saw a distant gaze and hard features. She did not want to know what others were doing or what they had felt when we called with the news because such stories were not about Owen. They were solely about these people and the pain they had felt when the accident entered their lives. This was excruciating for Alison, who felt responsible for their suffering. The signals I gave out were more conflicted. Throw it my way, they said. Give me another vantage point on this catastrophe so I can grasp its enormity. Owen's death is too large to remain a private affair. I want this knowledge and I want this closeness. But do not tell me too much. Do not turn this death into a spectacle or a collective trial that taught us something and brought us closer together, even if that is true. Do not suggest that your grief resembles mine. These were unreasonable expectations, I knew that. One friend recalled that, during her first phone call, Alison had asked how she would go on living. Another told us she was in her car when her husband, who was standing outside, answered his cell phone. She watched him speak and then sob, though she did not know why. These are the kinds of recollections Alison sought to avoid. But I listened because our lives tipped over at that exact moment and I wanted to understand the world into which we had tumbled. One day, a friend began describing the nervous anticipation that had filled our home in Woodstock, New York, as we made our way back from Utah, but she stopped midsentence because of Alison's obvious lack of interest. I was disappointed. Though I never asked, I would have liked to hear what happened when friends and relatives converged upon our home the day after the accident. They had to respond to a situation they barely fathomed and at the same time handle practical matters. Someone had to drive to the Albany airport and find the courage to face us and say those initial words. Something else: what should the house look like when we arrived? I imagine that this entailed many decisions: where people would position themselves, whether food would be laid out, how bright to set the lights. There was a scene to compose. I was only dimly attuned to all of this but did realize that people were stepping in and making decisions--they were making decisions for us. This was one of the mental notes I kept during the early days, tabulating as best I could the widening gulf between the old reality and the new. Two friends made the hour-long drive to Albany. It was dark, I think, when we left the airport. I sat in the backseat, feeling already like a passenger in my own life. I do not think that we discussed anything substantive during the ride, though I could be wrong. A haze surrounds these days, with random moments of clarity etched into my memory. Among these moments: the sight of my mother, the first person whom I saw as we pulled into our garage. She shuffled across the dusty concrete floor with tiny penguin-like steps, ashen-faced, arms half-open. Though she moved slowly, I knew that she would reach me, grip me, collapse upon me. Behind her stood my father, smaller than in the past, my in-laws, my brother-in-law, friends from the area and others who had already flown in, all part of a funereal receiving line that meandered from the garage to the entryway, the kitchen, and finally the living room, a line of still and silent beings who resembled embalmed corpses. What happened afterward? Did Alison and I sit with one person or one small group at a time? Did we talk about the Green River? Did we plead fatigue and retire to our room? And Julian--where did he go? All I know is that at some point that evening or the next day, lights went up, frozen bodies thawed, and waxlike faces regained elasticity. People began to move, first in slow motion and then faster until they were twirling from one room to another, up and down the stairs, onto the deck, into the garden. The house lit up with a circular energy that was manic and magical, an energy that surrounded us but could not touch me. Alison and I began dating within months of moving to New York in the late 1980s, both of us fresh college graduates. We left for Chicago a few years later--I began doctoral studies in French history, Alison planned events for nonprofits--and returned in 2000, when New York University hired me. Having missed the early Giuliani era, we came back to a city that was cleaner and more affluent than the one we had known. We had two sons now, Julian and Owen, born three years apart in the late 1990s. Through their school and Little League games, we found ourselves in a universe of music producers, architects, account executives, film editors, academics, artists, venture capitalists, and foodies--all of us wearing black jeans and listening to the Red Hot Chili Peppers, or later Wilco. There was something intoxicating about downtown, a self-awareness of cool powered by a mix of prosperity and faux nonchalance. New York also felt safer than the city we had known in the 1980s--except of course on 9/11. We were living in a Battery Park City rental, a few blocks south of the World Trade Center and within the evacuation zone. When we returned to our apartment to collect our belongings a week later, the fire still smoldered, its odor pungent. Trees sported white leaves--pages from memos, official letters, and instruction manuals shredded into macabre confetti. A dozen crushed ambulances and police cars were stacked outside our building like metal pancakes in primary colors. We left the neighborhood for the Upper West Side but feared that this would not be enough distance, not enough protection against the next attack. This led us to purchase a home, for shelter and summers, in Woodstock, New York, two hours north of New York City. We met other urban refugees there, and also musicians and painters, onetime employees of a now-shuttered IBM plant, retired schoolteachers, svelte yogis, butchers who also coach Little League, bow-hunting carpenters, troubadour rabbis, and aging hippies who sometimes look the part and sometimes do not. Beyond the facile caricatures, it was an easy town to like. Our house was nestled in a dead end, surrounded by acres of forest. We had never lived among bears, snakes, and coyotes before, but this place felt oddly secure, as if, like giant cotton balls, the trees and bushes could muffle noise and vibrations. This is where we spent the first weeks after the accident--hidden away. Everything was filtered, freed from the weight of obligations, pity, and accidental encounters with well-meaning acquaintances. Alison and I did not have to leave the house, not even to buy groceries, because friends and relatives took care of everything, preparing breakfast, answering the phone, welcoming well-wishers, signing for deliveries, and making runs to the hardware store. One of them called the local tennis club, where Owen had been slated to begin day camp, and explained that he had died. Others brought Julian to batting cages, anything to maintain the semblance of normalcy. (Such outings left Julian exposed in ways we had not anticipated. He later told us that, when a camper asked if he had siblings, he gave a frank answer. Oh shit, the kid said.) Another one of our friends placed sleeping pills in our bathroom to help us get through the night. Alison took one every evening; I never did, but we both opened ourselves to this spellbinding human alignment, these tiny gestures inside our own home. We became the silent center of a micro-society that filled the space Owen had left vacant. The day after our return from Utah, I retreated to the small studio that serves as my office. Bookshelves cover all of the walls except for a section devoted to the kids' drawings and a large bay window that opens onto the forest and a bluestone quarry. This is where I had written historical books and articles over the years, but that morning I sat at my desk to draft a preliminary version of our eulogy. Alison and I had taken notes on the flight home and agreed that I would show her something by midday. Writing Owen's eulogy was in some respects an impossible exercise, a confrontation with reality that proved so raw I had to turn my back to Owen's art on the walls. But alone in this quiet space, surrounded by trees and traces of the path that quarrymen had followed decades earlier, I heard Owen for the first time since the accident. The eulogy flowed on the page, with ready-made sentences and echoes of his voice. All parents must carry within them biographies of their children, unwritten but available at a moment's notice. Ours began with the joy of having two boys and the pain of living without one of them. Alison and I told anecdotes about a child who had memorized our credit card number and recounted some of his small victories that spring. We touched upon the accident and Owen's absence. All that remained, we said, were recollections--and something else: Owen looked into himself and into the outside world with penetration and feeling. He sought understanding while remaining aware of his own frailty and limitations. He embraced the beauty and efflorescence of life while grasping its darker, impenetrable side. If Owen has left us a legacy, then this is it. These words continue to ring true even if I now realize that legacy talk is what the two of us needed at that moment. Owen's life had to harbor some deeper meaning. Alison and I also felt compelled to speak against anger. We had both felt its pull within days of the accident, and so we pushed back. We would no doubt feel anger in the future, we said. "But not today." An anger that was equal to the death of Owen would consume us; it would scorch the earth and the insides; it would preclude all other emotions, even sadness; it would make it impossible to truly see, to understand what had happened and who we were becoming. There was no religious belief or ethical framework behind our words, just the conviction that once we surrendered we would lose ourselves and lose Owen--we would lose him again. This, too, we needed to say and hear that day, as if to make a public commitment, to ourselves and to the rest of the world. A life without anger, a life with as little anger as possible: this became almost right away our mantra and our daily practice. The morning after writing the eulogy, I woke up knowing we would bury Owen that day. Every morning, there are parents who wake up knowing this is what they will do before sunset. I dragged my legs to the side of the bed and raised my body, hoping to accrue enough momentum to overcome the inertia that kept me pinned under the sheets. As I stood up, I wondered how the day would unfold. I might sit prostrate on a chair, or sob uncontrollably, or fall on my knees in the cemetery. Or perhaps Alison would behave in ways I did not recognize. The images of bereaved parents that I carried with me suggested that all of this was possible. After losing her seven-year-old daughter, the friend of a friend screamed in bed every morning. This was terrifying, but her behavior seemed appropriate. Alison wore a navy sleeveless dress with pleats and a short gray sweater. The rabbi recommended that I pick an old tie since, following Jewish custom, we would cut it (and Alison's sweater) before the services. I chose my favorite tie instead; Owen deserved it. Afterward, we met our relatives in the synagogue library. I felt numb and restless, remote yet hyper-present. In the great room, quiet but full of static when we took our seats next to Owen's coffin, people barely moved as the rabbi chanted and then summoned Alison and me to deliver the eulogy. We read paragraphs in turn while holding the sheets of paper between us, her hand and mine touching the words. Like a passing of the baton, this responsive recitation kept us in motion. It gave us balance. Julian watched from the front row though I do not know what he heard. I do not recall what he wore either (there are no photographs). Alison and I paid attention to Julian, but not as closely as before. He later told us that, for weeks, we did not concern ourselves with what he ate. Alison stood tall, feet planted on the platform. At the cemetery afterward, she held my hand firmly. It was a bright day, with a big blue sky surrounding Overlook Mountain, a local peak we had recently hiked with Owen and Julian, climbing past the ruins of a Gilded Age resort that had burned down long ago. The rabbi asked the mourners to create space for the three of us to walk around the grave. Afterward, still within this human circle, we shoveled dirt onto the casket. Alison remarked that a gust of wind blew out of nowhere at that moment. Before picking up the shovel, she stepped toward the black hole, as if to peer in. I placed my hand on her arm. "You really thought I would jump in, didn't you?" she asked during the car ride home. She smiled faintly, but I think that she felt slighted, as if I had doubted her strength. Perhaps I had: it was easier to focus on her potential breakdown than to face my own. At the house, mourners overflowed into the garden. This was no longer an indeterminate mass, but familiar people who held our hands, squeezed our shoulders, looked us in the eye. One of them thanked me. Minutes later, someone else did the same. So it went as the afternoon blended into the evening and the sun lost its intensity somewhere beyond Overlook. Thank you for your words, friends told me. We came to offer you strength, but you have helped us. Alison heard the same words and found them as jarring as I did. It took me months to understand the relief that people felt when we stood before them in the synagogue, spoke of a present without anger, and imagined our future alongside Owen's. This is not what they had expected. We might have screamed uncontrollably or jumped into the grave. Hardly anyone mentioned Owen in my presence that afternoon. I barely mentioned him myself; this made me feel ashamed, but it seemed easier that way. At one point, I ended up among fathers from the kids' school who bantered about vacations and the like--anything to fill the silence. I listened, then wandered off. Circling the small groups in dark colors, my eyes fell upon the couch where Owen had sat reading, legs crossed, a few weeks earlier. The book he had picked up on our coffee table that day--New York Changing--coupled Berenice Abbott's photographs of New York City in the mid-1930s with shots of the same locations sixty years later. While some spots had not changed, many are now unrecognizable. The Wanamaker's department store on Broadway and Ninth Street--razed. The block-long gas tanks in Yorkville--vanished. The Jamaica Town Hall--replaced by a McDonald's. Talman Street in Brooklyn--now gone, all of it. Later that evening, once everyone had left and we had put Julian to bed, I picked up the book and sat where Owen had sat to scrutinize the before and the after. As I pored over the photographs, I pictured him doing the same, feeling the force of catastrophic events that erase the past with coldhearted brutality. Who among us remembers Talman Street? And who will remember the boy who just the other day, just before he died, saw entire worlds vanish before his eyes? The metaphor seems so neat now. But this is what Owen had read on that couch, and this is what I came to feel the day I buried my son, when the fear of jumping in gave way to the prospect of total erasure. That night, Alison and I lay side by side on the bed. We talked about the day that had elapsed--the day we buried Owen--and moved closer. We needed to touch, but neither one of us said so, as if some taboo forbade carnal intimacy on this day of all days. Our cheeks touched, our lips met, and then we held each other with an intensity I thought had vanished on the river, an intensity without desire but sharp enough to cut through the night's crystalline stillness. For an instant I stepped outside myself and watched our bodies interlock, but only for a moment because stronger forces took over and overpowered all doubling of the self, all thoughts of sacrilege. Alison and I came together and at that instant she began sobbing, quietly but for what seemed like a very long time. It was devastating and yet felt so perfectly normal at the end of this day that I could not tell what it said about our future together. Is it necessary to say that during the weeks that followed, pain scorched our bodies, leaving us hollowed out? In the morning, I often woke to find Alison on her back, eyes wide open, mind churning. That was how we now began our days, trying to make sense of who we were. Once, Alison said that the hole Owen had left was so huge that she would have to wrap her mind around it in little bits. Otherwise she would drown. Soon enough, we would purge our language of aquatic metaphors (keep your head above water, the current is dragging me down), but that day Alison did not notice and neither did I. For weeks, friends continued to fill our house. They made themselves available and tried to gauge our mood. All we had to do was receive their offerings. This proved easy for Alison, who accepted all invitations: get-togethers on the deck, hikes, walks around lakes, afternoons on the couch. Companionship was the only way to get through the day, she said. Though she did not want to hear how people found out about the accident, Alison quickly concluded that entombing her grief would bring her down. And so she opened our home to all comers, close and distant. Those who gave her what she needed confirmed what she already knew about the generosity of human nature. Those who did not were outliers. Unlike Alison, I had never expected people to act in altruistic ways. Trust was a leap of faith, more likely to yield pain or disappointment than solace. Nothing had occurred on the river to challenge this outlook, and yet I could not deny that people were now showing up for difficult conversations. This happened; it was real. During these early days, I followed Alison's lead and grieved for Owen in the company of others. Julian, eleven at the time, did so as well. But one day he told us he did not like living in a house full of strange voices. There were too many little kids requiring supervision and too many adults intruding on his space. "The B----'s, where did they come from?" he asked. "They just showed up." It feels unseemly and almost ungrateful to say so, but the constant presence of others soon overwhelmed me, too. Our home had become a kibbutz, a Soviet kolkhoz, a collective with sounds and rhythms and rituals that were no longer ours. It was less about trust than space, silence, and the possibility of listening to myself and perhaps hearing Owen as well. So I volunteered for chores outside the house and checked the recyclables bin several times a day, hoping that there would be enough bottles to warrant a run to the dump. I took refuge in my studio, looking out the window at the forest and the wild turkeys that crossed the quarry path. And one evening, seeking relief from the strange voices that spooked Julian, I asked Alison for a day without visitors. We did little that day, but it was just us, groping our way through the stillness and a house that was not yet ours, trying to sense what it would feel like to become a family of three. Excerpted from Disaster Falls: A Family Story by Stephane Gerson All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
Table of Contents
Prologue | p. 1 |
Part I The First Year | p. 5 |
Part II The Place of the Dead | p. 151 |
Part III End Stories | p. 217 |
Epilogue | p. 247 |
Author's Note | p. 251 |
Sources | p. 253 |
Acknowledgments | p. 257 |